Providing compensation to multiple individual wildfire victims, including families and businesses, and certain other parties with wildfire-related claims is a lengthy process.
Fire victims may have claims arising from both economic and non-economic damages caused by destruction or damage to real estate and personal property, additional living expenses, lost wages, business losses, personal injury or death and related medical expenses, and emotional distress.
What an economist cannot do is the following: Quantify emotional distress. Emotional Distress claims include claims for mental anguish that you experienced fearing for your safety or the safety of your family while evacuating or sheltering-in-place during the Fire or from the loss of use or substantial interference with the use of or enjoyment of your property as a result of the Fire.
On the other hand, damages caused by destruction or damage to real estate and personal property, additional living expenses, lost wages, business losses, personal injury or death and related medical expenses can be quantified by a qualified expert economist.
Legal guidelines are mapped out under 3903F. for Damage to Real Property. 3903G. for Loss of Use of Real Property. 3903K. for Loss or Destruction of Personal Property and 3903N. for Lost Profits.
The followings are examples of business income loss.
Lost revenues, inventory, commercial vehicles and other contents on behalf of a business affected by the Fire. These losses may also include increased business expenses stemming from those losses. For purposes of classifying a claim. If you are a sole owner, best documents that can assist an expert are taxes on a Form 1040 with a Schedule C, E or F that lists expenses.
Personal Income Loss claims are those that relate to lost wages affected by the Fire. You will need to provide the following information for a job you held as of the date of the Fire, for which you are seeking compensation for lost wages related to the Fire.
Here are questions an expert economist will want to be answered.
Employer Information. For each Job, the following information about the employer: (1) Employer Name; (2) Employment Start Date; (3) Employment End Date; (3) Length of time out of work
An example is a burned vineyard. In such cases, CACI 3903I specifies how damages to perennial crops should be calculated. The harm to the crop is determined as follows.
For the time period from the destruction of the crop until the crop can be restored one must:
1. Determine the rental value of the land with the crop; and
2. Subtract from this amount the rental value of the land without
Damages for the destruction of the perennial crop, which can be harvested and sold, are determined as follows:
1. Determine the expected market value of the crop before the harm occurred;
2. Subtract from this amount the estimated costs of producing and marketing the crop, excluding costs that have already been paid.
In the plants, seeds or roots responsible for producing the crop are destroyed, the measure of damages may also include the costs of reseeding or replanting.
The distinction drawn between the wrongful destruction of perennial crops, such as volunteer grass for grazing purposes, and annually planted crops is most important. In the former case, the proper measure of damages is the difference in the rental value of the property with and without the crops, while in the latter case the proper measure of damages is the market value of the estimated product at the time of destruction, less the cost of producing and marketing the same.
Also, if the roots of the grass in a pasture have been destroyed by fire so as to prevent the matured stocks from automatically reseeding the field, the measure of damages includes not only the rental value of the pasture, but also the additional cost of reseeding the field.
The measure of damages for the destruction of or injury to fruit, nut, or other productive trees is generally the difference in the value of the land before and after the destruction or injury. Damages may be additionally measured by the value of the trees on the premises in their growing state. Some courts have also awarded damages for the resulting crop loss.
A grower may recover for loss of the crops during year(s) of losss, the increased labor in the care of the land, and damages for injury to the trees themselves. More recently, the measure of damages for the destruction of fruit trees has included the costs of replacing the trees or restoring the property to its condition prior to the injury. In Baker v. Ramirez, the court held that the cost of restoring an orange grove was the most appropriate measure of damages, where there was no impediment to replacing the orange trees and it was reasonable to replace the trees because only a small portion of the grove was damaged. The court noted that the difference between the value of the property before and after the injury was only one possible measure of damages.” (Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water Dist. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 439, 447 [105 Cal.Rptr.2d 856, 861]
Here is list of the 20 most destructive wildfires, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
|CZU Lightning Complex Fire||86,509|
|LNU Lightning Complex Fire||363,220|
|North Complex Fire||316,685|
|Painted Cave Fire||4,900|