Antitrust & Competition

Antitrust is a term that refers to laws and regulations that are designed to promote competition and prevent monopolies and other anti-competitive practices in the marketplace. In the United States, antitrust laws are enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

There are several types of antitrust violations that can occur, including:

  1. Price fixing: This occurs when businesses agree to set prices at a certain level or to avoid competing with each other on price.
  2. Market allocation: This occurs when businesses divide up a market or customers among themselves in order to avoid competition.
  3. Monopolization: This occurs when a business uses its dominant market position to exclude competition or to engage in anti-competitive practices.

Price fixing is a type of antitrust violation that occurs when businesses conspire to set prices at a certain level or to avoid competing with each other on price. This can result in higher prices for consumers, as well as reduced competition and innovation in the market. Price fixing can take many forms, including agreements to fix prices, agreements to maintain minimum prices, and agreements to use price floors or ceilings. Price fixing can be particularly harmful in industries where prices have a significant impact on consumer behavior, such as the retail industry.

Market allocation is another type of antitrust violation that occurs when businesses divide up a market or customers among themselves in order to avoid competition. This can take many forms, including agreements to allocate territories, customers, or products. Market allocation can result in reduced competition and higher prices for consumers, as well as a lack of innovation in the market. Market allocation is particularly harmful in industries where competition is essential for driving innovation and improving products or services.

Monopolization is a third type of antitrust violation that occurs when a business uses its dominant market position to exclude competition or engage in anti-competitive practices. This can take many forms, including predatory pricing, exclusive dealing, and tying arrangements. Monopolization can result in higher prices for consumers, reduced innovation, and reduced access to goods and services. Monopolization is particularly harmful in industries where a single company has significant market power, such as the tech industry.


In an antitrust lawsuit, the plaintiff (usually the government) must prove that the defendant (usually a business or group of businesses) has engaged in anti-competitive conduct. If the plaintiff is successful, the defendant may be ordered to stop the conduct and may be required to pay damages to compensate the plaintiff for their losses.

Antitrust violations can have serious consequences for businesses, as they can result in significant fines and other penalties. It is important for businesses to be aware of their legal obligations and to take steps to ensure that they are not engaging in anti-competitive conduct.

Antitrust violations have been a concern for governments and consumers for decades. There have been several high-profile cases of antitrust violations in history and modern development. For example, in the late 19th and early 20th century, Standard Oil Company was found to have engaged in monopolistic practices that gave it an unfair advantage over its competitors. The government eventually broke up the company into several smaller companies, leading to increased competition and innovation in the oil industry.

In the 1960s, the US government filed an antitrust suit against IBM, accusing the company of monopolizing the computer industry. The case was eventually settled, and IBM was required to license some of its technology to competitors. This led to increased competition and innovation in the computer industry.

In recent years, there have been several high-profile antitrust cases involving tech companies. For example, in 2020, the US government filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google, accusing the company of engaging in anticompetitive practices in the search and advertising markets. The government argued that Google’s dominance in these markets had stifled competition and innovation. The case is ongoing, but if the government is successful, it could lead to increased competition in the search and advertising markets.

Another recent example is the antitrust case against Apple brought by the European Commission. In 2016, the Commission ruled that Apple had received illegal tax benefits from Ireland, giving it an unfair advantage over its competitors. Apple was ordered to pay back $15 billion in unpaid taxes to Ireland. This case highlights the importance of preventing businesses from receiving unfair advantages over their competitors.

Recently, on March 7, 2023, Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta delivered remarks on the Department of Justice’s decision to file a lawsuit to block JetBlue’s proposed acquisition of Spirit. Gupta noted that the proposed merger would result in higher airfares, reduced quality of service, and decreased competition in the airline industry. She stated that the DOJ’s Antitrust Division conducted a thorough investigation and found that the proposed merger would eliminate competition between JetBlue and Spirit, leading to a near-monopoly in several key markets.

Gupta emphasized the DOJ’s commitment to promoting competition and protecting consumers in the airline industry, stating that “vigorous competition is essential to ensuring that Americans have access to affordable, high-quality air travel.” She also noted that the DOJ’s enforcement efforts have resulted in significant savings for consumers and increased competition in the airline industry.

Gupta’s remarks highlight the DOJ’s continued efforts to promote competition and protect consumers through antitrust enforcement actions, particularly in the airline industry. The DOJ’s decision to block the proposed merger between JetBlue and Spirit demonstrates its commitment to ensuring that consumers have access to affordable and high-quality air travel options.

Antitrust violations can take many forms and can result in significant harm to consumers and the economy as a whole. By enforcing antitrust laws, the government can promote competition and innovation, protect consumers from price-fixing and market allocation schemes, and prevent monopolies from stifling competition and innovation.

Commercial litigation support can be valuable for businesses that are involved in antitrust disputes, as it can help to ensure that their legal rights are protected and that they receive the compensation they are entitled to. It is important to work with an experienced attorney or legal team in order to navigate these complex issues and achieve the best possible outcome.

Share
FREE CONSULTATION
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.