Establish Causation and Materiality

Causation is the legal principle that establishes a causal connection between an act and a resulting injury. In order to prove causation, a plaintiff must typically show that the defendant’s act was the “proximate cause” of the injury. This requires a showing that the defendant’s act was a “substantial factor” in causing the injury, and that the injury would not have occurred “but for” the defendant’s act. Materiality is a legal principle that establishes whether a particular fact is relevant to a given legal proceeding. In order to be considered material, a fact must have the potential to affect the outcome of the proceeding. Whether a fact is material generally depends on the circumstances of the case, and is often a matter of intense debate between the parties.

There are two general types of causation in the US: legal causation and factual causation. Legal causation is determined by the law, while factual causation is a question of fact for the jury to decide. The doctrine of proximate cause is an important part of causation in the US. Proximate cause is a legal doctrine that limits a person’s liability for damages to those that are reasonably foreseeable. It is often referred to as the “foreseeability” doctrine. The doctrine of contributory negligence is another important part of causation in the US. Contributory negligence is a legal doctrine that bars a plaintiff from recovering damages if they contributed to their own injury. Materiality is a legal term that refers to the importance of a fact. A material fact is one that would have a significant impact on the outcome of a legal case.

To further learn about the Causation and Materiality, click here.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.